 |
|
|
 |
 |
| 7:18pm EDT, Thu Sep 2 |
 |
|
 |
 |  |  |
|
|
 |
 |
CopperGate’s Weissman
By:
The Online Reporter
Publish Date: July 24, 2009
Complete articles are posted three weeks after they have been sent to subscribers. To request a copy of the current edition, e-mail paperboy@riderresearch.com .
| Underscoring its emphatic support for the next-generation home
network technology G.hn, the chipmaker CopperGate next week will
announce it’s been elected to the board of directors of HomeGrid
Forum, the Intel-backed association. The forum will develop and
certify G.hn standards, promote the product worldwide and authorize
certified products to carry its logo on their equipment and marketing
materials.
The United Nations’ International Telecommunication Union’s (ITU-T)
is overseeing the development of G.hn specifications.
HomeGrid is to G.hn what Wi-Fi is to 802.11, a marketing brand.
The intent is for G.hn to work over any of a home’s wiring: coax,
electrical and telephone.
CopperGate has been active in the ITU group’s efforts to develop
specifications and get them ratified. It’s no mean feat considering
the many conflicting vested interests the participating companies
have.
The company was involved in developing the HomePNA home network
standard. It’s the leading producer of HomePNA chips that go into
home network gear that many telcos, including AT&T, install in homes.
Michael Weissman, CopperGate’s VP of North American marketing, will
represent the company on the board.
He said G.hn will deliver the best performance over electrical lines,
coaxial cable and phone lines. He expects G.hn technology will be
integrated into low-cost chipsets.
CopperGate has consistently said it is determined to be the first to
ship G.hn-certified chips.
Intel’s Matthew Theall, who is chairman and president of the HomeGrid
Forum, said CopperGate is expected to be one of the first with G.hn
chips.
The ‘M’ Words: Market and MoCA
The market for wired home network gear and the chips they use has
become enormous because pay-TV companies overwhelmingly prefer wired
networks to wireless because they deliver flicker-free HD video and
can be secured against piracy.
Weissman said G.hn is the industry’s “best hope for a unified
wireline standard.”
Home network chips will be used in almost all consumer electronic
devices, such as TVs, set-top boxes, video download equipment
(digital media players like Roku and Vudu), network media storage
devices, gaming consoles, PCs and dedicated home networking equipment
such as routers, wireless access points, Internet gateways, Optical
Terminal Networks (ONTs) and iNIDs.
There is probably more MoCA-based home network gear installed than
any other standard. MoCA works only over coax.
Many consider coax as the best existing wiring in the home for
carrying high-def video in a copy-free manner. For example,
CopperGate’s biggest telco deployer, AT&T, uses its HomePNA network
gear mostly over coax, not the telephone copper wires on which
HomePNA also works.
Verizon uses MoCA gear exclusively. Most of the US cablecos are
expected (heck, have been expected) to announce standardization on
MoCA as their choice.
The Telco Factor
Several factors are working in favor of G.hn long term:
- The telcos AT&T, Verizon, France Telecom, BT, Telenor, Qwest and
others have been involved in developing G.hn specs.
- Telcos tend to favor ITU specs.
- There are more telcos than there are cablecos.
The Powerline standard is split into three incompatible “standards.”
G.hn is expected to serve as a unifying force for the three.
MoCA is already DLNA-compliant. G.hn needs DLNA certification to
enable consumer and computing devices to physically communicate with
each other.
In addition to CopperGate and Intel, the other HomeGrid directors
come from the retailer Best Buy; BT; the chipmaker Infineon
Technologies; Panasonic, which makes one of the three Powerline chips
and lots of consumer and computer gear; and set-top box chipmaker
Sigma Designs.
Weissman is co-author of the Amazon business bestseller “The Paradox
of Excellence,” which appeared in Harvard Business Review and Fast
Company Magazine.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |