 |
|
|
 |
 |
| 7:20pm EDT, Thu Sep 2 |
 |
|
 |
 |  |  |
|
|
 |
 |
RealNetworks Loses DVD Copying Decision
By:
The Online Reporter
Publish Date: August 14, 2009
Complete articles are posted three weeks after they have been sent to subscribers. To request a copy of the current edition, e-mail paperboy@riderresearch.com .
| A federal judge has ruled in favor of the movie industry and against
RealNetworks, saying that company’s RealDVD program violates the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and the terms of the DVD CSS
license that Real possessed.
The preliminary injunction barring RealDVD from being sold will
remain in place, according to Judge Marilyn Patel’s ruling, and the
DVD CCA is also entitled to some injunctive relief.
Patel said that the DVD copying products “by their very nature open a
veritable Pandora’s box of liability for Real.”
The decision brings to a close both RealDVD and Facet, a set-top box
designed to allow consumers to burn DVDs to a hard drive.
Real has yet to say if it will appeal, but it likely will. Many
observers believe an appeal will fail, citing the fact that Patel
took the arguments of the DVD CCA at face value, and subsequent
judges are likely to as well.
Patel’s main reason for her ruling came from what she saw as a
willful infringement on the part of Real. The judge said that Real
knew about anti-copying restrictions and technologies that were put
in place by the studios and that Real actively worked to find a way
around them. This willful action meant that Real violated the anti-
circumvention provisions set up by the DMCA, as well as the CSS
contract it had signed.
Patel’s ruling concluded that RealDVD was developed “primarily” to
circumvent the CSS technology, and that “Real has admitted its intent
upon initial development was to create a software product that copies
DVDs to computer hard drives so that the user does not need the
physical DVD to watch the content.”
Real got into trouble because it didn’t maintain the anti-copying
protections its contract required and because it actively made a
workaround for the ARccOS and RipGuard securities — these are two
third-party technologies that add small errors into DVDs to keep them
from being accurately copied.
And while fair-use claims were raised throughout the trial, the judge
reached an interesting conclusion. Patel said the DMCA doesn’t forbid
backing up of content for users, but it does prohibit the tools that
are used in creating the backups. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |